The United
Kingdom (UK) has revealed that it is reluctant to return Nigeria’s looted funds
because it cannot trust the country with such funds if returned. This was
disclosed by a Queen’s Counsel, Mr. Philip Hackett, while speaking on the
theme: ‘Institutionalising the War against Corruption – New Approaches to
Assets Tracing and Recovery’, at the Annual General Conference of the NBA in Abuja
on Wednesday, 29th August, 2018.
Reacting to the
UK’s position, the Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC) described it as escapist,
ridiculous and unjust.
“There is no
basis whatsoever for Britain to make such a claim. The main question is: who
owns the money? Once it is established that the funds belong to the Federal
Government of Nigeria, UK has no excuse holding on to it, talk less of
pronouncing conditionalities. Britain cannot be keeping Nigeria’s money.
Nigeria is not a land of morons. On the contrary, we are among the most intelligent
people in the world.
“Britain is
asking us for more transparency. That question might have been relevant in the
days of corrupt leadership. Anyone who is serious about refunding money should
do so now that we have a transparent and credible leader.
“That excuse is
anachronistic and irrelevant in Buhari’s Nigeria. Buhari has made a huge
difference and Western countries which have no hidden agenda should
reciprocate. Any country that still holds on to stolen funds should be seen as
either a thieving nation itself or an accomplice. Why ask for more transparency
when we already have a world acclaimed anti-corruption leader as president? It
is simply escapist. UK’s reservation is an afterthought, mischievous and
irresponsible. Britain has its own agenda. Its economy is benefiting from
Nigeria’s looted funds and it wants this to continue.
It is on record
that returned money has been used wisely by the Buhari administration. An
example is the Abacha loot which was recently returned by Switzerland and
shared among poor Nigerians. The $322 million Abacha loot was disbursed through
Conditional Cash Transfers (CCT) to 302,000 poor households in 19 states of
Nigeria in July 2008. It shows that the present administration can be trusted to
use returned money wisely and transparently.
“Now we
understand the logic. Western nations have been using the endemic corruption in
some African countries as an excuse for keeping money stolen from those
countries in their own vaults. Also, it is becoming clear now that the repeated
allegation by Western countries that there is still widespread corruption in
Nigeria under Buhari is aimed at the same objective. They are using it as an
excuse to keep our looted funds in foreign vaults ad infinitum. Nigeria’s money
has only moved from one individual and unpatriotic thief to a corporate thief
and a rogue nation.
“Yes, we affirm
clearly, emphatically and unequivocally that Western nations who refuse to
repatriate money looted from developing countries are rogue nations. They are
living on the sweat of weaker countries. They have a heavy moral burden to
carry”.
MURIC knocked
Britain for its attitude on funds looted from Nigeria. “Britain’s attitude to
looted funds from Nigeria exposes the underbelly of capitalism. It implies that
capitalism is blind to morality. It does not matter where money comes from.
Capitalists must grab it from left, right and centre. It does not matter if
they step on the dead bodies of millions of poor people of the oppressed
nations of the world to get the money. Capitalism is devoid of all human
feelings. Capitalism has no veins, no vessels, no blood. Capitalism is like dry
wood.
“Britain’s
attitude to Nigeria’s looted funds also makes a mockery of democracy. Is this
what the West calls democracy? Is it about freedom to sit on looted funds
hiding under ludicrous excuses? Is democracy about the freedom to move illegal
money from poor nations to powerful countries? If that is true, then democracy
is the most pernicious and most inhuman ideology in the world. The decision to
continue sitting on our money is impunity of the highest order. Where is
Britain’s morality?
“How many
looters take their money to communist or Islamic states? How much of Nigeria’s
money is in Russia? How much is in China? How many looters have taken their
money to Saudi Arabia or Iran? Shame on capitalism and democracy.
“It is an
insult to say that Nigeria cannot be trusted with looted funds if returned. The
UK government should answer this question: If Mr. A’s house is burgled and the
stolen items are traced to Mr. B’s house, has Mr. B any moral or legal right to
ask Mr. A that he must first guarantee that he would not allow his house to be
burgled again before releasing his stolen items to him? What do you call Mr. B
after all said and done?
“Isn’t there
some law against receiving stolen item in Britain? We love to remind the UK
that we have such a law here in Nigeria in case Britain forgets. The paradox
lies in the fact that the law on receivers of stolen items is a legacy from
Britain. So who did this to UK? Do we call it colonial amnesia? How did
morality go haywire in the Queen’s own land?
“UK is using
money looted from Nigeria to finance its economy at the expense of Nigeria. In
short, all the noise about the UK supporting the fight against corruption in
Nigeria is meaningless as long as the same UK refuses to reprtriate stolen
funds. It also means UK is encouraging graft”.
MURIC also
taunted Britain over its reluctance to vomit Nigeria’s money. “By the way, what
is Britain arguing about? Switzerland coughed out $322 million in July this
year. The United States has pledged to return $500 million very soon. What is
Britain ready to give? Is the UK holier than the US and Switzerland put
together?
“If UK cannot
trust us to use repartriated funds wisely, we also cannot trust Britain with
our money. It is our money and our money is our money, not Britain’s. This is
the same colonialist who exploited Nigeria for more than a hundred years. What
did we gain at the end? Britain asked us to close our eyes and pray. By the
time we opened our eyes, our land was gone. Our culture was in tatters. How can
we trust such people again particularly with our money?
“For the
avoidance of doubts, Africans did not have to wait for the common law to be
imported from Britain before demonizing and criminalizing the concept of
received stolen goods. A popular Yoruba adage says ‘Eni ti o gbe epo laja nikan
ko ni ole, eni ti to gba lowo re gan, ole ni’, i.e. the man who steals palm oil
from the ceiling is not the only thief, his accomplice who stood below and
helped him to collect it from the ceiling is also a thief because without him
the thief who climbed the ceiling would have failed in his devilish mission.
“Used in the
context of this argument, Britain as well as other Western nations who receive
looted funds from Nigeria and other poor nations are as guilty as those who
stole the money from their countries. Nigerian looters were in the ceiling
siphoning their country’s wealth into big bags, Britain and other receivers of
looted money were on the ground below them giving the stolen funds the much
needed soft landing.
“As we draw the
curtain, we aver that Nigeria may have to approach the International Court of
Justice on this matter. Diplomacy is sometimes a potent agent of
procrastination. Let us explore the legal angle parri passu. We charge our
leading lawyers, renowned human rights activists and the Nigerian civil society
to take up the struggle. Britain and other countries who are yet to repatriate
Nigeria’s looted funds should be taken to international courts for arbitration.
Let the world adjudicate.
“We invite
Britain and other countries still keeping Nigeria’s looted funds to expedite
action on its repatriation. Nigerians are not imbeciles whose money must be
managed for them by ‘clever’ foreigners. We demand unconditional respect for
our country. Nigerians are among the best of the best in the world.
Professor Ishaq
Akintola,
Director,
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)
Muslim Rights Concern (MURIC)
No comments:
Post a Comment